Re: [svg-aam] Take a pass at existing pointers to the SVG AAM and CORE AAM sspecifications (#42)

I had a quick look at the broken Core AAM links - it's not obvious what parts of the current Core AAM document should be referenced - possibly because some content has been removed.

It also looks like there's a syncing issue with https://www.w3.org/TR/SVG2/ - this is the 2018 CR version. The SVG2 Editors Draft is actively maintained but doesn't look like its been published to /TR/ since 2018. I don't think this will be quick to resolve.

Seems to me the broken fragment references are just another symptom of SVG AAM not being maintained, so my 2 cents is just publish "as-is" and fix these later. What do you think @cyns ?

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by dd8
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/svg-aam/issues/42#issuecomment-3871734560 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Monday, 9 February 2026 13:32:34 UTC