- From: David Bruchmann via GitHub <noreply@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2025 18:27:42 +0000
- To: public-svg-issues@w3.org
> I would also prefer to remove the overall recommendation to use defs for sustainability/file-size reasons - because the more critical reasons that would justify recommended status are incorrect. I'm surprised, but curious which reasons you'd still accept. > In cases like this, where the overall SVG design carries the accessibility features, using defs is pointless. My understanding is that `defs` might be treated as objects of the same kind, which would make rendering less performance -consuming and more fluid in the clients' browsers if animated. It might be wrong or dependent on the browsers. Your paragraph looks also a bit contradicting to me, but perhaps you've more details. > It may be holding back more efficient design processes. Well, that might be true, but the spec isn't about the processes. Of course it's good sorting wrong arguments out though. -- GitHub Notification of comment by DavidBruchmann Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/svgwg/issues/1007#issuecomment-3286411184 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Friday, 12 September 2025 18:27:43 UTC