- From: Karl Dubost via GitHub <noreply@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2025 02:27:07 +0000
- To: public-svg-issues@w3.org
Spec Confusion… So I was trying to fix this test which basically makes `animatedPoints` an alias of `points` https://wpt.live/svg/shapes/animatedPoints-non-animated.html https://wpt.fyi/results/svg/shapes/animatedPoints-non-animated.html The fix in WebKit https://github.com/WebKit/WebKit/pull/46806/files But doing that there are other 4 other tests which kept the previous SVG 1.1 definition of AnimatedPoints. * https://wpt.fyi/results/svg/animations/additive-type-by-animation.html * https://wpt.fyi/results/svg/svg/animations/animate-css-xml-attributeType.html * https://wpt.fyi/results/svg/animations/svgpointlist-animation-1.html * https://wpt.fyi/results/svg/animations/svgpointlist-animation-2.html which led me to search the issue repo for the spec, then led me here. MDN https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/SVGPoint link to SVG 1.1 but with no link to SVG 2.0 The comment above about reversal seems to be tied to the approval of CSS WG. https://github.com/w3c/svgwg/issues/706#issuecomment-544697551 But I don't see a followup from the CSS WG. If reverted the WPT test is an easy fix, and I can close my PR. https://wpt.live/svg/shapes/animatedPoints-non-animated.html TODO Spec PR. @shallawa @sideshowbarker ? -- GitHub Notification of comment by karlcow Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/svgwg/issues/706#issuecomment-2978722935 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 17 June 2025 02:27:08 UTC