Re: [svgwg] Grammar Issue in "Path" (#807)

Indeed, this is a mistake in the current SVG 2.0 spec. I have discussed this here:

https://github.com/w3c/svgwg/issues/752

And in particular:

https://github.com/w3c/svgwg/issues/752#issuecomment-555971317

Where I propose the following grammar, which is equivalent to your proposal:

```
svg_path ::= wsp* (moveto (wsp* drawto_command)*)? wsp*
```

See also:

https://github.com/w3c/svgwg/pull/778

Question to the members of the Working Group: what can we do to move forward on this front? It's been almost a year that I mentionned these fixes and improvements, also including: https://github.com/w3c/svgwg/issues/751. Those are very easy fixes (broken grammar that was correct in SVG 1.x, i.e., now-forbidden whitespaces), and readability improvements which impact in no way what the spec mandates (it only makes it easier to understand what the spec mandates).

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by dalboris
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/svgwg/issues/807#issuecomment-687140119 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Friday, 4 September 2020 13:19:18 UTC