- From: Paul LeBeau via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 08:28:53 +0000
- To: public-svg-issues@w3.org
@dirkschulze I guess it depends on your mental model of how transforms work. And whether you think in terms of pre- or post-multiplied matrices. I prefer the description in SVG 1.1, that describes it in terms of it's equivalent transform functions: > The operation represents the equivalent of the following specification: `translate(<cx>, <cy>) rotate(<rotate-angle>) translate(-<cx>, -<cy>)`. I guess technically the Transforms spec is the same. But writing it out as a full sentence makes it less intuitive in my opinion. To me it switches the context around. -- GitHub Notification of comment by BigBadaboom Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/svgwg/issues/644#issuecomment-471446725 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 11 March 2019 08:28:54 UTC