- From: CSS Meeting Bot via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 21:17:24 +0000
- To: public-svg-issues@w3.org
The SVG Working Group just discussed `Text-anchor & RTL text`, and agreed to the following: * `RESOLUTION: No major changes. Re-examine the spec text for clarifications after creating tests.` <details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary> <AmeliaBR> Topic: Text-anchor & RTL text<br> <AmeliaBR> github: https://github.com/w3c/svgwg/issues/628<br> <AmeliaBR> Dirk: Amelia, could you update?<br> <AmeliaBR> Amelia: So, clearly an interop problem. I think its mostly browser bugs, but probably could use some spec clarifications.<br> <AmeliaBR> Dirk: Are changes necessary for SVG 2.0<br> <AmeliaBR> Tav: needs better tests<br> <AmeliaBR> Amelia: Yes, either way tests are needed.<br> <AmeliaBR> Tav: for Inkscape, it looks like we're ignoring text-anchor on tspan. which is our bug.<br> <AmeliaBR> Dirk: Is there one rendering that is correct?<br> <AmeliaBR> Amelia: Looks like librsvg. But there are differences about glyph selection as well as alignment, not sure which version is correct.<br> <AmeliaBR> Dirk: Ok, so we need tests. Do we also need to change the spec.<br> <AmeliaBR> Amelia: That might be easier to decide as we write the tests. Need to make sure that every test is clearly supported by spec text.<br> <AmeliaBR> Dirk: Can we resolve then to revisit after testing?<br> <AmeliaBR> Amelia: To confirm, that means we are sticking with the main idea of the spec, that text-anchor is only based on explicitly declared `direction`, not on directionality of text characters?<br> <AmeliaBR> Tav: Yes, I don't think we want to change that now.<br> <AmeliaBR> RESOLUTION: No major changes. Re-examine the spec text for clarifications after creating tests.<br> </details> -- GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/svgwg/issues/628#issuecomment-456201151 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 21 January 2019 21:17:26 UTC