- From: Chris Lilley via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 20:54:48 +0000
- To: public-svg-issues@w3.org
> So why not "SVG 2.0 Tiny"? Probably because Tiny 1.1 and Tiny 1.2 had animation, for example (and text) while this is a more aggressive subset and does not. -- GitHub Notification of comment by svgeesus Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/svgwg/issues/657#issuecomment-483414831 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 15 April 2019 20:54:53 UTC