[svgwg] Issue: Since vector-effect options other than non-scaling-stroke already have multiple implementations, is the "at risk" flag valid? marked as Agenda+ from Dirk Schulze via GitHub on 2018-11-13 (public-svg-issues@w3.org from November 2018)

From: Dirk Schulze via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 06:14:17 +0000
To: public-svg-issues@w3.org
Message-ID: <issues.labeled-208303736-None-sysbot+gh@w3.org>

dirkschulze has just labeled an issue for https://github.com/w3c/svgwg as "Agenda+":

== Since vector-effect options other than non-scaling-stroke already have multiple implementations, is the "at risk" flag valid? ==
Gecko patch: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1318208
Polyfill: http://svg2.mbsrv.net/devinfo/devstd/non-scaling-objects-2/VectorEffect_polyfill_wScreen.html


See https://github.com/w3c/svgwg/issues/306

Received on Tuesday, 13 November 2018 06:14:20 UTC