- From: CSS Meeting Bot via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2018 19:47:08 +0000
- To: public-svg-issues@w3.org
The Working Group just discussed `pathLength PR`. <details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary> <AmeliaBR> Topic: pathLength PR<br> <AmeliaBR> gitHub: https://github.com/w3c/svgwg/pull/485<br> <liam> [are we on 485 or https://github.com/w3c/svgwg/issues/383 ? ]<br> <liam> AmeliaBR, in most cases differences in path length adjustment will cancel out, but we have a special rule about handling path length of zero<br> <liam> and for a +ve length you go to the end of the path instead of the beginning<br> <liam> so the only change is to say that doesn't affect MISSED<br> <liam> Eric: any +ve non-% length goes to the end of the path<br> <AmeliaBR> s/MISSED/percentage length values/<br> <liam> Dirk: if that's implemnt behaviour it's fine with be<br> <liam> AmeliaBR: Eric - are there tests for the changes?<br> <liam> Eric: there were non-percent path lengths,haven't done zero with % but i'll add them now<br> <liam> AmeliaBR: need a review, ok with me<br> <ericwilligers> Any positive non-percentage lengths goes to the end of the path.<br> <liam> Eric: new proposal (see preceding IRC line)<br> <ericwilligers> Percentages resolve to 0 when pathLength is 0<br> <liam> Dirk: for 0 you'd get the end of the path but percentages resolve to zero<br> <ericwilligers> 0 is always the start of the path.<br> <liam> AmeliaBR: these are all edge cases anyway<br> <liam> Eric: I'll send a new pr and tests.<br> <ericwilligers> https://github.com/w3c/svgwg/issues/484<br> </details> -- GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/svgwg/pull/485#issuecomment-403598138 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 9 July 2018 19:47:13 UTC