- From: Chris Lilley via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2018 12:10:28 +0000
- To: public-svg-issues@w3.org
svgeesus has just labeled an issue for https://github.com/w3c/svgwg as "Structure chapter": == Implicit and allowed roles for SVG element in a HTML document == Related specs: * https://www.w3.org/TR/html-aria/#svg * https://www.w3.org/TR/SVG2/struct.html#implicit-aria-semantics Both specifications define different implicit and allowed roles for the `svg` element. My first assumption was: ```html <html> <body> <svg> <!-- should validate against the html spec --> <svg> <!-- should validate against the svg2 spec --> </svg> </svg> </body> </html> ``` But both are inside the SVG namespace, so I started wondering if my assumption is correct. And maybe the should only be validated to the SVG2 specification. What is the correct behavior? See https://github.com/w3c/svgwg/issues/372
Received on Wednesday, 17 January 2018 12:10:30 UTC