- From: Chris Lilley via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2018 12:10:28 +0000
- To: public-svg-issues@w3.org
svgeesus has just labeled an issue for https://github.com/w3c/svgwg as "Structure chapter":
== Implicit and allowed roles for SVG element in a HTML document ==
Related specs:
* https://www.w3.org/TR/html-aria/#svg
* https://www.w3.org/TR/SVG2/struct.html#implicit-aria-semantics
Both specifications define different implicit and allowed roles for the `svg` element. My first assumption was:
```html
<html>
<body>
<svg> <!-- should validate against the html spec -->
<svg> <!-- should validate against the svg2 spec -->
</svg>
</svg>
</body>
</html>
```
But both are inside the SVG namespace, so I started wondering if my assumption is correct. And maybe the should only be validated to the SVG2 specification.
What is the correct behavior?
See https://github.com/w3c/svgwg/issues/372
Received on Wednesday, 17 January 2018 12:10:30 UTC