Re: [svgwg] Change the use element shadow tree to closed

Has enough of this behavior been implemented post-the Blink/WebKit split that they would count as separate implementations? If so, that's your two.

I don't think Firefox and MS Edge are yet fully shifted over to a shadow DOM model, although they would probably pass some tests, re event retargetting and so on.

Re: digressions. feel free to peruse the current spec test for how I was suggesting a modern shadow DOM element tree could pretend to also be a SVG 1.1 element-instance tree.  (They're elements, but everything is read-only! And immutable! and they have extra properties!) As I commented above, it will streamline the spec considerably to drop it.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by AmeliaBR
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/svgwg/issues/363#issuecomment-343386154 using your GitHub account

Received on Friday, 10 November 2017 06:27:08 UTC