- From: Nikos Andronikos via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 00:50:40 +0000
- To: public-svg-issues@w3.org
> I want to make it very clear for the record how ridiculous this statement sounds. At the 2016 face-to-face meeting which Eric references, the working group spent a considerable amount of time asking browser vendors to implement and ship more of SVG 2. Are we now to be taken to task for fulfilling the working group's wishes? While there were certainly requests for implementation of SVG2 features, to be fair, there was also a process where the group would resolve on what features were ready for implementation and I don't recall a resolution for this feature. -- GitHub Notification of comment by nikosandronikos Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/svgwg/issues/320#issuecomment-305050102 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 31 May 2017 00:50:46 UTC