- From: David Bruchmann via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2017 09:38:32 +0000
- To: public-svg-issues@w3.org
Just seeing the using svg in plural is svgs, that's the same like I proposed for "static SVG". So the proposition is bad as it can be misinterpreted. If the approach with two file-extensions should be realized another file-extension is advisable. -- GitHub Notification of comment by DavidBruchmann Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/svgwg/issues/266#issuecomment-310621131 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 23 June 2017 09:38:38 UTC