- From: Amelia Bellamy-Royds via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 14:54:24 +0000
- To: public-svg-issues@w3.org
That commit was me copying over @nikosandronikos's changes from 77ee7388622fb7a5b19ca08451e370a13b8795f3 and previous commits. However, I am fairly confident that you are correct, @nical, and that this was an unintentional change. As you noted in https://github.com/bodoni/svg/issues/3, scientific notation has been problematic when trying to convert SVG to be more compatible with CSS. But my understanding was that it would continue to be valid in attributes. However, I now don't see any references to it in [the Data Types chapter](https://svgwg.org/svg2-draft/types.html#syntax). Does anyone else remember a specific decision to remove support for scientific notation? That would be a major breaking change! -- GitHub Notification of comment by AmeliaBR Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/svgwg/issues/286#issuecomment-250190983 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 28 September 2016 14:54:32 UTC