- From: Ms2ger via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2016 08:28:53 +0000
- To: public-svg-issues@w3.org
> Given that reviews are going to be required, I don't see requiring a template as too big an obstacle. I strongly disagree: there's a significant difference between "check that this matches the spec and potentially add some cases" and "rewrite every single test from scratch". > the reason we wanted to do this was to help non browser implementations such as Inkscape sort the tests they want to comply with (reftests) from the others that they don't support (script tests). There's no need to do that by separating the files into distinct directories; we have scripts that will output a manifest of tests sorted by type already. -- GitHub Notification of comment by Ms2ger Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/svgwg/issues/269#issuecomment-247546377 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 16 September 2016 08:29:04 UTC