Re: [svgwg] Clarify meaning of context-fill & context-stroke keywords in paint definitions

@BigBadaboom But a hatch can be used as a stroke as well. So there is 
a potential for circular references.

Not saying its an insurmountable problem.  We can always define them 
in such a way as to deal with circular references when the occur, but 
allow the generic case so paint servers that will be used for fill can
 reference `context-stroke` and vice versa.

Maybe I'll add a warning that the definition of "context element" 
could be expanded in the future, and that authors are therefore not to
 rely on the fallback to "no paint" behavior.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by AmeliaBR
Please view or discuss this issue at 
https://github.com/w3c/svgwg/issues/203#issuecomment-232251396 using 
your GitHub account

Received on Wednesday, 13 July 2016 04:06:45 UTC