Re: [svgwg] Define context-fill & context-stroke keywords, or defer to a future spec

I did not see those, Nikos.  (Maybe my keyword search of the source 
code was foiled by some extra whitespace???)  That makes more sense.  
I knew we used to have more information, so I couldn't figure out why 
it wasn't there.

But there is also a lot of intervening text and examples.  I think 
what's needed is a link from the "a special keyword" bit down to the 
actual definitions, and being consistent with terminology.  I'm going 
to need to do some other tweaking to the wording there, to handle 
`<use>` elements and shadow DOM, so I can make those changes.

@BigBadaboom Not the way `context-fill` and `context-stroke` are 
currently defined, as representing a full paint stack (not just a 
color).  We had discussed a separate `context-color` keyword that 
could be more flexible, but didn't come to a decision on how it would 
be set on the context element.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by AmeliaBR
Please view or discuss this issue at 
https://github.com/w3c/svgwg/issues/203#issuecomment-232245051 using 
your GitHub account

Received on Wednesday, 13 July 2016 03:19:08 UTC