- From: Paul LeBeau via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 20:00:34 +0000
- To: public-svg-issues@w3.org
Even if none of those features make it to SVG2. I feel like the spec should at least acknowledge 1.2 Tiny and explain that it is considered a dead fork. And that SVG2 is a development of 1.1. At the moment 1.2 is only present as a sort of unacknowledged haunting spirit. Poor old 1.2 :) -- GitHub Notification of comment by BigBadaboom Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/svgwg/issues/199#issuecomment-231847066 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 11 July 2016 20:00:42 UTC