- From: Nikos Andronikos via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 03:40:27 +0000
- To: public-svg-issues@w3.org
nikosandronikos has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/svgwg: == Define all cases for intrinsic ratio == Currently in the spec, we have this issue https://www.w3.org/TR/2015/WD-SVG2-20150915/coords.html#issue30 This section maybe isn't as well written as it could be, but I think it's complete in terms of describing all it needs to describe. But I would like a second opinion. The constraints are: - width and height are presentation attributes. - the default value for width and height is `auto` and `auto` is defined to be 100% - this means that width and height are never unspecified. The default is to be 100% of the containing block. - If no viewBox exists, the extra transformation defined by the viewBox is simply omitted. Additionally ,preserveAspectRatio is ignored if no viewBox is given. These constraints mean that the possible combinations are: |width|height|viewbox|intrinsic ratio| |-----|------|-------|---------------| |length|length|VB.w x VB.h|width / height| |length|percentage|VB.w x VB.h|VB.w / VB.h| |percentage|length|VB.w x VB.h|VB.w / VB.h| |percentage|percentage|VB.w x VB.h|VB.w / VB.h| |length|length|unspecified|width / height| |length|percentage|unspecified|undefined| |percentage|length|unspecified|undefined| |percentage|percentage|unspecified|undefined| Which are all covered by the current prose. So I'm tempted to just do some general tidy up of that section and close the issue. Does anyone who knows more about this than me disagree? Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/svgwg/issues/197 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 11 July 2016 03:40:34 UTC