- From: Jeff Schiller <codedread@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2010 10:20:58 -0700
- To: public-svg-ig@w3.org
- Message-ID: <AANLkTi=mWbRsCaNndzBD36cxTF8AmvUyhyptkQJNqfMX@mail.gmail.com>
Hello all, I'm sorry I haven't been very active here for quite awhile - and that I couldn't attend the conference this year. Lots of you know that I started a new job and moved the family across the country. Things are starting to settle in a bit more now, but my own bandwidth is still rather tight. For this reason, I'd like to keep the main tasks the IG take on to a minimum and do a couple things right instead of scattered into a "million directions". Certainly things like updating the Wikipedia page are good tasks to take on, but I personally don't think that needs to be an official SVG IG activity. This is actually something that a single individual could do and simply report progress here if they feel so inclined (Wikipedia actually encourages aggressive editing after all). I really encourage this type of evangelism, but not sure if I want to help manage them all within the IG. What do you all think? What are the most important tasks that we, as a group, can accomplish? Last year we had decided upon two: * SVG Torture Tests * SVG WG Book Do we, as a group, still feel these are the highest priority items? I also think it's fair to say that our experiment with building a community at PlanetSVG was unsuccessful. I think it would be good for us to admit this and move on - does anyone have suggestions as to what should be done about that site and domain? Jeff On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 7:17 AM, Ruud Steltenpool <svg@steltenpower.com>wrote: > 1. Since SVG support in IE is around the corner, isn’t it time to >> rewrite the SVG article on Wikipedia to include interactivity, script, >> animation, etc.? Wikipedia has a huge repository of SVG imagery already >> and it might make sense to use that forum to showcase some of the cooler >> features of this language that will soon become a lingua franca for >> people speaking vector graphics. >> > > I'm sure the Wikipedia page on SVG is not fully up-to-date and improving > the situation is a good investment. > A small thing i'll begin with: execute on the ideas i have for the icon: > http://www.planetsvg.com/blog/17174/help-improving-svg-image-wikipedia > > > Other ideas? >> > > A lot of SVG content on the web is not very semantic and not very > re-usable. I think improving on this situation would significantly increase > the use of SVG. > > > Last news from WG looks good: http://twitter.com/svgwg > > >
Received on Wednesday, 8 September 2010 17:21:51 UTC