Re: SVG IG Torture tests

Wade,

The 'unsorted' is where I've been putting my ad hoc tests.  You can
take a look at the examples there to get an idea of what I considered
an acceptable format - but feel free to invent your own.

Jeff

On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 5:30 PM, Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org> wrote:
> Hi, Wade-
>
> G. Wade Johnson wrote (on 2/7/10 4:45 PM):
>>
>> Now taking the list in a completely different direction, I've got a
>> question on the torture tests.
>>
>> I stumbled across an issue with (at least) radial gradients that is
>> different between different browsers/viewers. It's not exactly a
>> "torture test", but it is a good compatibility test.
>
> That sounds perfect as a start on a set of practical tests.
>
>
>> Do we have a preferred form for this kind of test?
>>
>> I was thinking of an HTML page with variants of the SVG listed on the
>> left and PNGs with the expected output on the right, labeled
>> appropriately. Does that match other people's expectations? Should each
>> variant have it's own HTML page? Do we have any suggestions on
>> standardized naming, yet?
>>
>> If there are no defined approaches yet, I'll probably toss my examples
>> into svgtorture, assuming we'll move things around as consensus gels.
>
> My suggestion would be to simply put whatever you have up there.  We can
> always change the format later, what we need is the meat of the tests.
>
> Regards-
> -Doug Schepers
> W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs
>
>

Received on Sunday, 7 February 2010 23:32:36 UTC