- From: Jeff Schiller <codedread@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2010 17:32:03 -0600
- To: "G. Wade Johnson" <gwadej@anomaly.org>
- Cc: SVG IG List <public-svg-ig@w3.org>
Wade, The 'unsorted' is where I've been putting my ad hoc tests. You can take a look at the examples there to get an idea of what I considered an acceptable format - but feel free to invent your own. Jeff On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 5:30 PM, Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org> wrote: > Hi, Wade- > > G. Wade Johnson wrote (on 2/7/10 4:45 PM): >> >> Now taking the list in a completely different direction, I've got a >> question on the torture tests. >> >> I stumbled across an issue with (at least) radial gradients that is >> different between different browsers/viewers. It's not exactly a >> "torture test", but it is a good compatibility test. > > That sounds perfect as a start on a set of practical tests. > > >> Do we have a preferred form for this kind of test? >> >> I was thinking of an HTML page with variants of the SVG listed on the >> left and PNGs with the expected output on the right, labeled >> appropriately. Does that match other people's expectations? Should each >> variant have it's own HTML page? Do we have any suggestions on >> standardized naming, yet? >> >> If there are no defined approaches yet, I'll probably toss my examples >> into svgtorture, assuming we'll move things around as consensus gels. > > My suggestion would be to simply put whatever you have up there. We can > always change the format later, what we need is the meat of the tests. > > Regards- > -Doug Schepers > W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs > >
Received on Sunday, 7 February 2010 23:32:36 UTC