- From: Andreas Neumann <a.neumann@carto.net>
- Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 08:35:49 +0100
- To: SVG IG List <public-svg-ig@w3.org>
yes - this should be probably be removed. In my experience I also came to the assumption that Batik is not in general slower than others. When used as an applet in the browser it may be slower to start up and for larger files you have to assign more memory than the default 64MB, but once it started its quite fast. Andreas G. Wade Johnson wrote: > On Mon, 16 Feb 2009 10:40:09 -0600 > Jeff Schiller <codedread@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> I've updated the article [1] based on feedback from Dave Porter (added >> some starting instructions for each) and Alexander Adam (removed some >> bias from the Renesis section). >> > > I hate to be the one to do it, but you might want to reconsider the > Batik disadvantage "Java is typically slow." > > In my performance tests [1], the standalone Batik browser was > no slower than either FireFox or Opera. In fact, it was faster in some > tests. > > Granted, this is not the same as a plugin. But, I find it hard to > reconcile the comment about Java being slow with my measurements. > > G. Wade > > [1] - http://anomaly.org/wade/projects/svg/profiling/ >
Received on Tuesday, 17 February 2009 07:36:31 UTC