- From: Jeff Schiller <codedread@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 17:09:11 -0600
- To: "G. Wade Johnson" <gwadej@anomaly.org>
- Cc: SVG IG List <public-svg-ig@w3.org>
G. Wade, I'm not sure if you saw my email [1] before you posted this or not. Unfortunately this has been a long-standing action item and I'm not sure what the technical/political issues behind it are. I'm hoping someone on the SVG WG can answer this question as it is clear this hinders adoption of the format. Regards, Jeff [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2009Feb/0010.html On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 5:03 PM, G. Wade Johnson <gwadej@anomaly.org> wrote: > > In answering a FAQ on the SVG Developers list, I got an unexpected > response. One of the people in the discussion said his ISP refused to > configure the web server to serve SVG because the image/svg+xml mime > type wasn't registered. > > A search of relevant RFCs and IANA seems to support this statement. > > Is there anything we can do to suggest to W3C that registration of > image/svg+xml with IANA would help with the uptake of SVG? > > G. Wade > -- > Perl's grammar can not be reduced to BNF. The work of parsing perl is > distributed between yacc, the lexer, smoke and mirrors. > -- Chaim Frenkel > >
Received on Saturday, 7 February 2009 23:09:52 UTC