Rich Schwerdtfeger <richschwer@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Regarding changes needed due to the SVG working group, are any needed?
>
>
Depends what you mean by that.
There is no SVG WG currently. The WG's charter extension expired at the end
of January, without any agreement on a replacement, and I don't know if
anyone has been assigned as a staff contact to replace Doug.
For our specs: The changes needed to sync the SVG-AAM with the SVG 2 CR are
in the Editor's Draft from August (
https://w3c.github.io/aria/svg-aam/svg-aam.html). Note that even though
the working draft of SVG-AAM has a later date, it is an earlier version; we
had too many delays getting it published last summer.
I'm sorry, I should have made more of an effort to get that published as an
updated WD in the fall. I'm not sure the process for getting it published
now.