- From: Joanmarie Diggs <jdiggs@igalia.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 12:22:57 -0500
- To: Fred Esch <frederickesch@gmail.com>
- Cc: Shane McCarron <shane@spec-ops.io>, SVG-A11y TF <public-svg-a11y@w3.org>
Hey all. I am looking into failures encountered when my ATTA is used with the SVG testable statements found here: [1]. My recollection of the consensus reached was that the presence of a valid aria-label value necessitated inclusion in the accessibility tree -- even if the element with that aria-label also had aria-hidden="true" or was contained in an ancestor with aria-hidden="true". However, that seems to contradict the expectations in a significant number of tests on the aforementioned testable statements page. Could someone please clarify if my recollection is wrong or if the testable statements are? If it is the former, then I have an implementation to fix, but if it is the latter, it would be great to have the testable statements wiki corrected. Thanks! --joanie [1] https://www.w3.org/wiki/SVG_Accessibility/Testing/Test_Assertions_with_Tables_for_ATTA
Received on Tuesday, 15 November 2016 17:23:38 UTC