On 2016-03-04 3:53 PM, Joanmarie Diggs wrote: > Also, it seems that WebKit and Gecko do not agree with your > interpretation in this regard. So.... If you feel strongly that your > interpretation is correct, then we probably need different language in > the AccName spec, perhaps changing: > > the current node is not already part of an aria-labelledby traversal > > to: > > the current node was not already visited in this calculation I suggest switching to a more code like technique and introduce a "proccess-labelledby flag" and a "proccess-describedby flag". Then, change step 2B (my emphasis) from: if computing a name, and the current node has a non-empty aria-labelledby attribute, *and the current node is not already part of an aria-labelledby traversal*, process its IDREFs in the order they occur: to: if computing a name, and the current node has a non-empty aria-labelledby attribute, *and the ' proccess-labelledby' flag is false, then set the ' proccess-labelledby' flag to true*, and process the current node's IDREFs in the order they occur: // current three steps for proccess the IDREFS *Once all IDREFS have been processed, reset the ' proccess-labelledby' flag to false.* Similar changes for the " proccess-describedy" flag. -- ;;;;joseph. 'Die Wahrheit ist Irgendwo da Draußen. Wieder.' - C. Carter -Received on Monday, 7 March 2016 16:29:52 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:28:20 UTC