- From: Amelia Bellamy-Royds <amelia.bellamy.royds@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 11:25:56 -0700
- To: SVG-A11y TF <public-svg-a11y@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAFDDJ7w0b33QH4+qPht-Oxx=uKz7iyXhbRbHRBcRn7z2EAo5vQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi all, In the SVG 2 spec, there are a couple issues in the Interactivity chapter that relate to focus and tabindex. On the SVG WG call, the chapter editors indicated they weren't very familiar with the topic. I said I'd bring it up with the SVG Accessibility task force. I'd appreciate if any of you have the time to look over the Focus section: https://svgwg.org/svg2-draft/interact.html#Focus Two issues are currently noted in the spec: <https://svgwg.org/svg2-draft/interact.html#issue3>This section needs to defer to HTML more rather than duplicate the wording from that spec. Need to decide how will replace some of the links pertaining to "in a document", "Document", and "being rendered" [These are currently links to definitions in the HTML spec]. This is dependent on Document work that needs to be added wrt. tabindex. Do we define our own definitions vs. what is in HTML5? I agree with the general intent to minimize duplication & defer to the established HTML rules whenever possible. However, I think there will need to be some SVG-specific language with respect to what is "rendered" or not. In particular, some SVG elements are never rendered & tabindex should have no effect if specified on them (e.g., you can't tab to a <filter> element). Please let me know (by replying to this message) if you see other issues, or if you have any suggestions or preferences on how to re-write the text. Or, if you want to volunteer to draft the new wording yourself! If there is anything that needs debate, I would like to take it up at the Tuesday January 26 SVG-A11y task force teleconference. The SVG WG is holding a F2F meeting the first week of February & is trying to get all substantive edits on SVG 2 locked in by then. Best, Amelia
Received on Friday, 15 January 2016 18:26:27 UTC