Re: Meeting time (Was RE: RE: new member Mark S)

I'm quite happy to re-open the discussion if it means more participants
sharing the workload.

Rich, are all the times you used in the poll in January still good for you?
http://doodle.com/poll/zxmyzm728qr4chat
Or can you add any others?

Léonie, are any of those times now clear for you, given other meetings that
have shifted?

Anyone else need to update their availability?

On 19 February 2016 at 04:04, Léonie Watson <tink@tink.uk> wrote:

>
>
> *From:* Richard Schwerdtfeger [mailto:schwer@us.ibm.com]
> *Sent:* 18 February 2016 15:54
>
> "We did discuss another date and time with a Doodle Poll and we ended up
> moving it to Tuesday."
>
>
>
> Understood. The meeting conflict that prevents me from making the new
> meeting time wasn't known then, and the WP chairs meeting needs to take
> priority.
>
>
>
> "Also, one of the things that went into the decision is that some of the
> people who could make the old time slot would often not come."
>
>
>
> It seems that semi-regular attendance at the old meeting time, versus
> assured non-attendance at the new meeting time, is a step in the wrong
> direction to me.
>
>
>
> Léonie.
>
>
>
> --
>
> @LeonieWatson tink.uk Carpe diem
>
>
>
>
>