Sounds good.
Rich Schwerdtfeger
From: Amelia Bellamy-Royds <amelia.bellamy.royds@gmail.com>
To: Richard Schwerdtfeger/Austin/IBM@IBMUS
Cc: SVG-A11y TF <public-svg-a11y@w3.org>
Date: 09/21/2015 06:32 PM
Subject: Re: update of WAI-ARIA Graphics Module and aria-gtype
Hi Rich,
I'm fine with any option that keeps it concise. However, be sure to keep
the generic text regarding "any other elements that the relevant
specifications say are never rendered". That both covers some deprecated
SVG 1 elements and keeps it future-proof for new elements.
ABR
On 21 September 2015 at 16:51, Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>
wrote:
Hi Amelia,
I am going through the latest API mapping specification.
In section 5.1.1 you called out all the SVG namespaced elements that
should not have an object in the accessibility tree. Also, later on you
ask whether we need to have links to the elements themselves.
In section 5.4.2 we already have all the SVG elements with links to the
spec. they are defined in in the table which can be readily seen if you
click on view as a single table. All elements indicated as "not mapped"
should not be exposed in the accessibility tree. Can't we just say this
and point to the table? The information is redundant if you put in the
definition of "not mapped."
Cheers,
Rich
Rich Schwerdtfeger
