- From: Amelia Bellamy-Royds <amelia.bellamy.royds@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 17:32:03 -0600
- To: Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: SVG-A11y TF <public-svg-a11y@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 21 September 2015 23:32:31 UTC
Hi Rich, I'm fine with any option that keeps it concise. However, be sure to keep the generic text regarding "any other elements that the relevant specifications say are never rendered". That both covers some deprecated SVG 1 elements and keeps it future-proof for new elements. ABR On 21 September 2015 at 16:51, Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com> wrote: > Hi Amelia, > > I am going through the latest API mapping specification. > > In section 5.1.1 you called out all the SVG namespaced elements that > should not have an object in the accessibility tree. Also, later on you ask > whether we need to have links to the elements themselves. > > In section 5.4.2 we already have all the SVG elements with links to the > spec. they are defined in in the table which can be readily seen if you > click on view as a single table. All elements indicated as "not mapped" > should not be exposed in the accessibility tree. Can't we just say this and > point to the table? The information is redundant if you put in the > definition of "not mapped." > > Cheers, > > Rich > > Rich Schwerdtfeger >
Received on Monday, 21 September 2015 23:32:31 UTC