- From: Amelia Bellamy-Royds <amelia.bellamy.royds@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 14:15:01 -0600
- To: "public-svg-a11y@w3.org" <public-svg-a11y@w3.org>
- Cc: Chaals McCathie Nevile <chaals@yandex-team.ru>
- Message-ID: <CAFDDJ7ziJM5TGrs1xO6V=Uaq04iJ_rArFD=+c+tHaRgSQJz4qw@mail.gmail.com>
Hello all, I've completed the promised edits to the SVG Accessibility API Mappings spec. There's a bulleted list of all changes (as well as links to the "Files changed" code diff) on the Github pull request page: https://github.com/w3c/aria/pull/97 I did not, in the end, incorporate a single, detailed summary of the name and description computation, as I had promised Chaals. Once I really took a careful look at it again, I winced. Copying over the existing text from the AccName spec would not add any clarity. I started to write a plain-language interpretation of it, but then decided that what really needs to be done is to edit the original so that in can be understood without translation. I may approach Joseph Scheuhammer and the other editors of that spec about re-writing that section completely. But that won't happen this week. Until my changes get merged into the main repo, you can view the compiled text on rawgit: http://rawgit.com/AmeliaBR/aria/svg-aam/svg-aam/svg-aam.html Please in particular look at the text of the Editor's Notes, which describe the outstanding issues that we are asking for particular feedback on. For screen reader users, these always start with a level-3 heading with the text "Editor's Note"; for visual users, they are the orange boxes. Best, Amelia On 21 October 2015 at 13:11, Amelia Bellamy-Royds < amelia.bellamy.royds@gmail.com> wrote: > Chaals, > > The <use> example is a good one (where you would want both specific and > generic descriptions available). As I interpret it currently, the > algorithm would only return one or the other, unless you explicitly use a > labelled-by or described-by value with multiple IDs. > > I will make the edits to include a single, complete version of the > algorithm and I will try to clarify the summary to match. However, we may > want to then discuss this on a teleconference to make sure that the > approach we're recommending is the one we want! > > Amelia > >
Received on Thursday, 22 October 2015 20:15:29 UTC