I consider the changes to be editorial and not requiring a vote-off. But did want to alert the TF to give people opportunity to object if they feel the need. But I hope nobody does... Michael On 25/02/2015 12:02 PM, Richard Schwerdtfeger wrote: > > Sounds good Michael. It will be even better with the new semantics for > charts, etc. That will be coming from the group. > > Am I correct in assuming that you don't require a task force consensus > vote to make this change? I am hoping not. :-) > > Best, > Rich >
Received on Wednesday, 25 February 2015 18:03:06 UTC