W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-svg-a11y@w3.org > April 2015

Re: Wiki or Github pages or?

From: White, Jason J <jjwhite@ets.org>
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 16:54:15 +0000
To: "chaals@yandex-team.ru" <chaals@yandex-team.ru>
CC: SVG WG axs TF TLA Ч-f ... <public-svg-a11y@w3.org>
Message-ID: <12FD0192-7094-4A92-9706-E4889CF9BA57@ets.org>

> On Apr 13, 2015, at 12:29, chaals@yandex-team.ru wrote:
> 13.04.2015, 16:33, "White, Jason J" <jjwhite@ets.org>:
> It's only effective for small documents - in large ones the editing plugin they use seems to break down.
> If we adopted the model below, it would also be possible for people to submit changes and have an editor apply them, and that's something I would in principle be happy to do.
I agree. Also, the level of formality influences how the document should be managed. There’s a difference between a collection of ideas and notes on a wiki page and a draft destined to become a formal publication of the working groups represented in this task force. If we’re leaning toward a requirements document published as a W3C note, then writing it in HTML under Git revision control would be preferable.


This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited.

Thank you for your compliance.

Received on Monday, 13 April 2015 16:54:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:28:14 UTC