- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 08:24:22 -0700
- To: Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org>, public-sparql-exists@w3.org
I am confused as to how this community group is supposed to work. As far as I know there are two proposals that have been put forward and no consensus has been achieved. This report contains only one of the two proposals. Why is the other proposal not included? Peter F. Patel-Schneider Nuance Communications On 03/23/2017 08:11 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote: > https://w3c.github.io/sparql-exists/docs/sparql-exists.html > > I've made some updates to reflect recent discussions and also to add > descriptive text. What I'd really like feedback on is where less can be > said. Just adding text to explain points risks putting too much in. > > Andy >
Received on Thursday, 23 March 2017 15:24:57 UTC