- From: james anderson <james@dydra.com>
- Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2017 00:26:19 +0000
- To: public-sparql-exists@w3.org
good morning; > On 2017-04-03, at 00:29, Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On 04/02/2017 03:26 PM, james anderson wrote: >> […] > > Ok, so there we differ. I do not see any way that > https://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-query/ can be construed in this way. There is > nothing in the document at all to support any reading other than the one where > substitution works on expressions in the SPARQL algebra, replacing pieces of > this algebra by other pieces of this algebra, and the result of substitution > is to be treated just like every other construct in the SPARQL algebra. here is another thought experiment: describe an implementation for “describe" as a concise bounded description in terms of the sparql algebra. best regards, from berlin, --- james anderson | james@dydra.com | http://dydra.com
Received on Monday, 3 April 2017 00:26:54 UTC