Re: issue formatting [Re: the suggested initial goal]

> On 2016-07-13, at 19:39, Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> https://w3c.github.io/sparql-exists/docs/sparql-exists.html
> 
> has an example for issue-1
> 
> james - please pick an issue and develop an example as you see it should be.

the particular format chosen is not significant.
it matters most, to get as much as possible in one place.
with that in mind, i modified the suggested page for the multiset problem, https://github.com/w3c/sparql-exists/wiki/EXISTS-must-permit-multiset-arguments <https://github.com/w3c/sparql-exists/wiki/EXISTS-must-permit-multiset-arguments>, in order to call out a standard format and collect the information.

no editorial changes were intended wrt the content.
the modifications do in-line one of the examples, as that is one aspect where comprehension is not well served by references.
it takes much more screen space that is desirable, but it is still to be preferred to tracing links.

in the the process of inlining the example, however, it did appear that
- not all links were to intended content,
- the example could be brought closer to the one above in the text, and
- so far as i understand the relation among data, query and result, i do not understand how the result is the result.

best regards, from berlin, 
---
james anderson | james@dydra.com | http://dydra.com