- From: james anderson <james@dydra.com>
- Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2016 20:34:40 +0000
- To: public-sparql-dev@w3.org
- Message-ID: <01020155a82ba3af-77b0cfc9-2885-42bd-ba91-c08f9eeb7aeb-000000@eu-west-1.amazonse>
good evening; > On 2016-06-30, at 15:05, Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 06/30/2016 04:50 AM, Axel Polleres wrote: >> Dear Andy, >> >> [...] >> >> I have to admit I couldn't follow the whole discussion but is there a mail/link which summarizes the issues (I am aware of the bnode injection issue, which more there are?) >> >> Thanks & best regards, >> Axel > > Hi Axel: > > I don't think that there is an email that is exactly what you asked for so I > have tried to put together a simple list of problems with EXISTS. The first > two problems are directly problems with the spec. The last three are cases > where the spec produces what can be considered to be counterintuitive results > and some implementations diverge from the spec. > > […] note that, in the issue descriptions which followed, the conclusions are subject to discussion, as they follow from interpretations of the recommendation which are not universal. best regards, from berlin, --- james anderson | james@dydra.com | http://dydra.com
Received on Friday, 1 July 2016 20:35:12 UTC