- From: Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org>
- Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2016 17:55:45 +0100
- To: public-sparql-dev@w3.org
The CG has been created: https://www.w3.org/community/sparql-exists/ where there is a link to the join process. Andy On 01/07/16 12:27, Andy Seaborne wrote: > Thank you everyone for the responses. > > I've started the Community Group creation process. Please show your > support at > > https://www.w3.org/community/groups/proposed/ > > The next step is to wait for 5 people to support the creation of the CG, > then W3C will create the infrastructure and we can begin. > > Once the creation process has happens, there are some suggestions from W3C: > > W3C page: "How do we get started in a new Community or Business Group?" > https://www.w3.org/community/about/faq/#how-do-we-get-started-in-a-new-group > > > W3C page "Good practice for running a group": > https://www.w3.org/community/about/good-practice-for-running-a-group/ > > Andy > > On 30/06/16 12:40, Andy Seaborne wrote: >> There are bugs in the SPARQL specification with regards to EXISTS. The >> RDF Data Shapes working group uses EXISTS, and other related mechanisms, >> in SHACL [1]. >> >> W3C process for corrections is recognized generally to be inflexible. It >> is normally to wait for the next WG to run and end which is a multiyear >> cycle - that does not fit with the RDF Data Shapes WG timescale. >> >> Community Groups can publish reports. These are not W3C standards. They >> do provide a way to record consensus or enumerate alternatives. This >> could be used to supplement the SPARQL errata process [2]. >> >> A suggestion is to use the W3C Community Group mechanism to describe a >> solution to this specific area in a timely manner. The CG would document >> a solution and create tests to pass over to the "RDF Tests" CG [3]. If >> there is no single consensus on one solution within the SPARQL >> community, including implementers and users, we can at least document a >> small set of approaches and note the approaches taken by implementations. >> >> Thoughts and comments? >> >> Please indicate if you would join such an effort. >> >> Andy >> >> [1] http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/shacl/ >> [2] https://www.w3.org/2013/sparql-errata >> [3] https://www.w3.org/community/rdf-tests/ >> >
Received on Friday, 1 July 2016 16:56:16 UTC