W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sparql-dev@w3.org > April to June 2016

Re: interaction of GRAPH and sub-SELECT

From: Alexandre Riazanov <ariazanov@systap.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 10:08:07 -0300
Message-ID: <CANK0mJSyGyWL1cvBLF50dB+c5bRphPku3oDRLrh+=DnDVk4-cg@mail.gmail.com>
To: james anderson <james@dydra.com>
Cc: public-sparql-dev@w3.org
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 7:37 AM, james anderson <james@dydra.com> wrote:

> good afternoon;
>
> On 2016-04-25, at 20:41, Alexandre Riazanov <ariazanov@systap.com> wrote:
>
> Hi everybody,
>
> I would appreciate any help on the following problem related to
> interpretation of the SPARQL 1.1 standard.
>
> ok.
>
> […]
>
>
> Now, consider the specific query in
> https://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/subquery/sq03.rq :
>
>
> select ?x where {
> graph ?g {
>   {select ?x where {?x ?p ?g}}
> }
> }
>
> To leave the issue of variable scoping aside,
>
>
> details may be more significant than initially apparent.
> the manifest indicates that the dataset is to be imported into a named
> graph.
> the test presumes that this graph is available as one of the named graphs
> in the default dataset.
> the binding for which is not that same as the binding for the object in
> the statement pattern.
>
> ok?
>

Got it, thanks!



>
> best regards, from berlin,
> ---
> james anderson | james@dydra.com | http://dydra.com
>
>
>
>
>
>


-- 
======================================
Alexandre Riazanov (Alexander Ryazanov), PhD
Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada
Skype: alexandre.riazanov
http://riazanov.webs.com/
http://www.linkedin.com/in/riazanov
tel: +1 506 639 1529
======================================
Received on Tuesday, 26 April 2016 13:08:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 April 2016 13:08:38 UTC