- From: Dau, Frithjof <frithjof.dau@sap.com>
- Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 07:23:36 +0000
- To: Miguel <miguel.ceriani@gmail.com>, "public-sparql-dev@w3.org" <public-sparql-dev@w3.org>
Hi, what about using B (as select-query, not construct-query) as subquery in A? If you only have to use the result of B once (!), then this should work fine, and you don't have to worry about having created triples which are not needed after the execution of A. Anyway, I am interested in an answer to that as well, as I sometimes had the wish to reuse the result of a query A in a query B several (!) times, and here subqueries do not work. Best Frithjof -----Original Message----- From: Miguel [mailto:miguel.ceriani@gmail.com] Sent: Donnerstag, 21. Februar 2013 18:07 To: public-sparql-dev@w3.org Subject: SPARQL 1.1 Construct Composition Hi everybody, I'm studying the possibility of doing automatic functional composition of SPARQL (1.1) Construct queries. A basic use case is the following. Throught a SPARQL construct query A, I define a local view of a remote SPARQL end point. Then I want to execute a (construct or select) query B on this local view. To do that, I could materialize the local view and then query it with B. But, if I'm able to compose query B to query A in a new query C to send to the SPARQL end point, I can have directly the result, potentially reducing the amount of data that has to be transmitted. Has anybody already worked on this? Thanks, Miguel
Received on Friday, 22 February 2013 07:24:06 UTC