- From: Richard Newman <rnewman@franz.com>
- Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2008 13:08:32 -0700
- To: "Seaborne, Andy" <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- Cc: Nuutti Kotivuori <naked@iki.fi>, "public-sparql-dev@w3.org" <public-sparql-dev@w3.org>, "public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org" <public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org>
Andy, Is this actually true? See the SPARQL Tests section of the table, which defines a match for two RDF terms. (Of course, they're not RDFterm-equal, so it produces a type error anyway.) -R On 6 Jul 2008, at 11:07 AM, Seaborne, Andy wrote: > Not trickier - uses a different part of the spec :-) > > See sec 11 operator dispatch table. > http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/#OperatorMapping > > Under (minimal) SPARQL, > > = (value"^^xsd:string , "value" ) > > has no entry in that table. So it's a type error and the FILTER is > false.
Received on Sunday, 6 July 2008 20:09:48 UTC