- From: Nuutti Kotivuori <naked@iki.fi>
- Date: Sat, 05 Jul 2008 18:22:04 +0300
- To: public-sparql-dev@w3.org, public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
Hello, In the latest SPARQL specification, in section 9.1, the ORDER BY clause, there is a bit that says: ,---- | SPARQL also fixes an order between some kinds of RDF terms that | would not otherwise be ordered: | | 1. ... | | A plain literal is lower than an RDF literal with type xsd:string of | the same lexical form. `---- The last two lines there are the interesting ones. Yet, directly below that it says: ,---- | SPARQL does not define a total ordering of all possible RDF | terms. Here are a few examples of pairs of terms for which the | relative order is undefined: | | * ... | * "a" and "a"^^xsd:string (a simple literal and an xsd:string) | * ... `---- As I read this, this piece is contradicting the one said just a paragraph above it. Hopefully a clarification on this could be written to the errata (or however these things are handled). -- Naked
Received on Saturday, 5 July 2008 15:22:42 UTC