W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sparql-12@w3.org > April 2019

Re: CG startup

From: Karima Rafes <karima.rafes@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 19:53:14 +0200
Message-ID: <CALsrFgOcKtHdnt6hcQzJF1Gr+sHT_exOLBPkzgzt9Mov8Y_C1g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Vladimir Alexiev <vladimir.alexiev@ontotext.com>
Cc: "SPARQL 1.2 Community Group" <public-sparql-12@w3.org>
Hi Vladimir

> Is the activity of this group closed?
I finished my thesis (in french). The chapter 5 is the conclusion of this
work [1].
I developed the simplest. There are still tests that are difficult or
useless to code because several parts of SPARQL 1.1 specifications are too
I did my maximum. The next step for me is to consolidate/change the
specifications, otherwise SPARQL will never be totally interoperable.

So, the project TFT [2] is in standby and will disappear when W3C offer all
tests with a tool such as TFT to validate the compliance with SPARQL.

If the tests and the tools to run the tests becomes a prerequisite for
validate the specifications, there will be less fonctionalities but SPARQL
1.2 will not have the interoperability problems  of SPARQL 1.1.

When the CG will work on the tests needed for SPARQL 1.2, I will try to
work with us (if I have the time).

[1] Karima Rafes. Le Linked Data à l'université : la plateforme LinkedWiki.
Université Paris-Saclay, 2019. Français.
[2] TFT tool http://tft-reports.bordercloud.com/


Le mar. 2 avr. 2019 à 14:40, Vladimir Alexiev <vladimir.alexiev@ontotext.com>
a écrit :

> Karima, I just posted this at https://www.w3.org/community/rdf-tests/  :
> Is the activity of this group closed?
> https://github.com/BorderCloud/TFT-tests/ runs continuous tests over some
> RDF repos, and tries to fix some of the tests.
> The biggest improvements needed in this suite is more flexible result
> comparison by the test runner, eg see #5 and #16 there.
> (the comment is awaiting moderation.)
Received on Tuesday, 2 April 2019 17:53:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 2 April 2019 17:53:53 UTC