- From: Karima Rafes <karima.rafes@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 19:53:14 +0200
- To: Vladimir Alexiev <vladimir.alexiev@ontotext.com>
- Cc: "SPARQL 1.2 Community Group" <public-sparql-12@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CALsrFgOcKtHdnt6hcQzJF1Gr+sHT_exOLBPkzgzt9Mov8Y_C1g@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Vladimir > Is the activity of this group closed? I finished my thesis (in french). The chapter 5 is the conclusion of this work [1]. I developed the simplest. There are still tests that are difficult or useless to code because several parts of SPARQL 1.1 specifications are too fuzzy. I did my maximum. The next step for me is to consolidate/change the specifications, otherwise SPARQL will never be totally interoperable. So, the project TFT [2] is in standby and will disappear when W3C offer all tests with a tool such as TFT to validate the compliance with SPARQL. If the tests and the tools to run the tests becomes a prerequisite for validate the specifications, there will be less fonctionalities but SPARQL 1.2 will not have the interoperability problems of SPARQL 1.1. When the CG will work on the tests needed for SPARQL 1.2, I will try to work with us (if I have the time). [1] Karima Rafes. Le Linked Data à l'université : la plateforme LinkedWiki. Université Paris-Saclay, 2019. Français. https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-02003672 [2] TFT tool http://tft-reports.bordercloud.com/ Bye Karima Le mar. 2 avr. 2019 à 14:40, Vladimir Alexiev <vladimir.alexiev@ontotext.com> a écrit : > Karima, I just posted this at https://www.w3.org/community/rdf-tests/ : > > Is the activity of this group closed? > https://github.com/BorderCloud/TFT-tests/ runs continuous tests over some > RDF repos, and tries to fix some of the tests. > The biggest improvements needed in this suite is more flexible result > comparison by the test runner, eg see #5 and #16 there. > > (the comment is awaiting moderation.) >
Received on Tuesday, 2 April 2019 17:53:52 UTC