Re: Collecting data on WAC and ACP usage

On Friday, March 20th, 2026 at 4:14 AM, Jesse Wright <jesse.wright@theodi.org> wrote:

> Dear Solid CG,
> 
> Following Wednesday's CG call, we are collecting data on WAC and ACP implementations across Solid applications, servers, pod services, and test suites. This information will help determine which specifications are recommended for Solid26.

Looking at other factors that may inform this decision, besides test suite which is alredy mentiond in the spreadsheet, there's also aspect of active spec editors.

While Sarven's participation in CG activities appears to be less regular than in the past, and Matthieu after some time away returned to Solid as part of ODI team. From my point of view WAC has an active editor, while I don't see ACP having one. Even when we were updating to proper CG report templates ACP never received that simple update. From my perspective WAC has advantage over ACP when it comes to having an active editor.

Also over last years Sarven was able to answer various questions related to WAC while ACP had no representation and there was no one who could be asked for any clarifications about intended way of using ACP.

Received on Monday, 23 March 2026 14:16:29 UTC