- From: elf Pavlik <elf-pavlik@hackers4peace.net>
- Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2026 23:21:50 +0000
- To: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-solid <public-solid@w3.org>
Hi Melvin, On Wednesday, April 15th, 2026 at 7:18 AM, Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com> wrote: > I've published a draft extending Web Access Control with acl:condition, using fail-closed evaluation semantics: > > https://webacl.org/secure-access-conditions/ > > Source: https://github.com/webacl/secure-access-conditions In principle I think forking something is an option. When I look at your repo I notice right always 1. It doesn't cleanly fork the original work, instead it may misled people that this is your individual creative work https://github.com/webacl/secure-access-conditions/commits/main/ 2. It doesn't pick another name e.g., MAC 2.0, instead it just presents itself as WAC 2.0 Even before discussing if I agree with a need to fork WAC, since you already are doing it I would suggest that you at least fork it properly. Best, eP
Received on Wednesday, 15 April 2026 23:22:00 UTC