Re: Mutual understanding between Solid CG and LWS WG regarding the input documents under Deliverables of LWS WG charter

po 24. 2. 2025 v 19:49 odesílatel Aaron Coburn <aaronc@inrupt.com> napsal:

> Hello,
>
> The LWS WG discussed this issue in today's weekly meeting. [1]
>
> The consensus view was that it would be acceptable for the CG to continue
> work on the editors' draft of the Solid Protocol specification, especially
> as it relates to fixing errors. The expectation is that the CG will not
> publish a new fixed version of the protocol, such as 0.12, nor that the CG
> would change the protocol in a significant way.
>

+1

(CG member hat)


>
> In addition, it is important to note that the WG will treat these
> documents as inputs, and the WG may be selective in what is adopted from
> those inputs.
>
> I hope that clarifies the issue from the WG side. It would be helpful if a
> CG chair could chime in on this thread from the CG perspective.
>
> Best regards,
> Aaron
>
> [1] https://www.w3.org/2025/02/24-lws-minutes.html
>
>
>
> On Fri, 7 Feb 2025 at 11:08, Jesse Wright <jesse.wright@jesus.ox.ac.uk>
> wrote:
>
>> + 1 on the mutual understanding to allow work such as
>> https://github.com/solid/specification/pull/711 to land within the CG.
>>
>> I also recommend the WG signal to the CG when it will start taking the
>> input documents into active consideration such that there there is a known
>> window of time in which there should be focussed effort on resolving
>> similar issues within the CG.
>>
>> I propose we make this an agenda item on Monday.
>>
>> Best,
>> Jesse
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> *From:* Sarven Capadisli <info@csarven.ca>
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 5, 2025 10:38:59 pm
>> *To:* public-lws-wg@w3.org <public-lws-wg@w3.org>; public-solid@w3.org <
>> public-solid@w3.org>
>> *Subject:* Mutual understanding between Solid CG and LWS WG regarding
>> the input  documents under Deliverables of LWS WG charter
>>
>> Hi all, IANAL, and I'm speaking for myself, not on behalf of anyone.
>>
>> It would be worthwhile to clarify a mutual understanding between the
>> Solid CG and the LWS WG regarding the items listed as input documents in
>> the LWS WG charter that have been Solid CG work items, e.g., the Solid
>> Protocol.
>>
>> Since the LWS WG charter mentions adopting the "Solid Protocol, latest
>> published version (0.11.0) or Editor's Draft" and to 1) avoid potential
>> deliberation on what was agreed and what was not, and 2) leave room for
>> continuous improvements, the mutual understanding for the time being can
>> be as follows:
>>
>> * LWS WG understands that Solid CG may continue updating the Solid
>> Protocol ED ( https://solidproject.org/ED/protocol ).
>>
>> * Solid CG understands that the LWS WG may adopt (or discard) changes
>> made to the Solid Protocol ED.
>>
>> That may seem evident in hindsight, but I can assure you that was the
>> intention (
>>
>> https://github.com/solid/solid-wg-charter/pull/63#pullrequestreview-1719987833
>> ).
>>
>> -Sarven
>> https://csarven.ca/#i
>>
>>
> This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the
> addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged, confidential
> and/or proprietary information. If you are not the intended recipient of
> this e-mail (or the person responsible for delivering this document to the
> intended recipient), please do not disseminate, distribute, print or copy
> this e-mail, or any attachment thereto. If you have received this e-mail in
> error, please respond to the individual sending the message, and
> permanently delete the email.