- From: Jeff Zucker (he/him) <dubzed@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2023 11:34:52 -0700
- To: Nicolas Chauvat <nicolas.chauvat@logilab.fr>
- Cc: Benjamin Goering <ben@bengo.co>, public-solid <public-solid@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAG2wPQ9jVSGsQwOZS3ZbdJ7ddbwWnpxo_MZokrS02FtMgyO9Ow@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, Oct 1, 2023 at 11:26 AM Nicolas Chauvat <nicolas.chauvat@logilab.fr> wrote: > If I wanted to develop a Solid Server, is there a test suite I could > run to prove that it works as described by the specification ? https://github.com/solid-contrib/test-suite On Sun, Oct 1, 2023 at 11:26 AM Nicolas Chauvat <nicolas.chauvat@logilab.fr> wrote: > Hi List, > > Le Sat, Sep 30, 2023 at 12:01:52PM -0500, Benjamin Goering a écrit : > > > It seems to me that it could be both higher ROI and less competitive > > to collaborate on a conformance and interoperability evaluation > > methodology that can test many servers, rather than try to figure > > out governance around a single implementation, which inevitably > > won’t meet the technical/aesthetic preferences of everyone. > > That would be very helpful. At the beginning of the year, we wanted to > get a feel of Solid. We tried to deploy existing servers and to > implement one using a web framework. The first hurdle was to figure > out what was the latest specification and if there were test suites > that could be run. We were not successful at identifying these and our > conclusion was that things were still in a very early stage and moving > forward would require to get involved in the community that is > designing Solid whereas we only had the time to try to use it. > > If I wanted to develop a Solid Server, is there a test suite I could > run to prove that it works as described by the specification ? > > -- > Nicolas Chauvat > > logilab.fr - services en informatique scientifique et gestion de > connaissances >
Received on Sunday, 1 October 2023 18:35:34 UTC