- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2023 12:03:57 -0400
- To: public-solid@w3.org
On 11/1/23 7:20 AM, Melvin Carvalho wrote:
>
> Now I might have a completely wrong mental model about this, so I'll
> think about your points, and that's why group discussion is good.
>
> More specific questions:
> 1. Should solid lite support the semantic web?
> 2. Should solid lite aim to take the simplest possible minimal subset
> with a chance of working?
> 3. Should solid lite support HTML?
Different angle:
Should solid lite support the structured data represented as entity
relationship graphs?
In regards to the above, what structured data representation notations
and formats should it support, as a minimum?
Implementers can make decisions about structured data representation
notations and formats while staying true to a universal entity
relationship graph representation of data.
Ultimately, in regards to data, we are dealing with the structure of
entity relationship types culled from observation.
--
Regards,
Kingsley Idehen
Founder & CEO
OpenLink Software
Home Page: http://www.openlinksw.com
Community Support: https://community.openlinksw.com
Weblogs (Blogs):
Company Blog: https://medium.com/openlink-software-blog
Virtuoso Blog: https://medium.com/virtuoso-blog
Data Access Drivers Blog: https://medium.com/openlink-odbc-jdbc-ado-net-data-access-drivers
Personal Weblogs (Blogs):
Medium Blog: https://medium.com/@kidehen
Legacy Blogs: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen/
http://kidehen.blogspot.com
Profile Pages:
Pinterest: https://www.pinterest.com/kidehen/
Quora: https://www.quora.com/profile/Kingsley-Uyi-Idehen
Twitter: https://twitter.com/kidehen
Google+: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Web Identities (WebID):
Personal: http://kingsley.idehen.net/public_home/kidehen/profile.ttl#i
: http://id.myopenlink.net/DAV/home/KingsleyUyiIdehen/Public/kingsley.ttl#this
Received on Wednesday, 1 November 2023 16:04:04 UTC