- From: James Doe <jamesdoejr@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2023 09:09:26 -0400
- To: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-solid <public-solid@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAPRkrBC0FQ=A1UUz6EV8G-XNfBrDqgHVTSkBRRj2+68BWCFhgQ@mail.gmail.com>
Amazing news, Melvin! Hey, I'm having a little stickiness and wondering if you could assist. I'm coding on a bare-metal project that uses homomorphic pseudonymization and `obfuscation through data aggregation` to protect the privacy of people who want to try opening up online to others about sensitive and personal issues. I was planning to write the code as proprietary, but after being in this group of amazing minds for some weeks, I feel as though it's important that my team adopt WebID and Solid as our basis. Things gain momentum when we move in unison 🚀 My issue is that I'm still a bit unclear as to the consensus on the vision for SOLID interoperability and standardization in the near-term (12 to 24 months), and I need this information to pull the trigger on orienting this digital mental health project around WebID and Solid core principles. Would you be able to point me in the direction of a Soli community who might be interested in and available to communicate with me about these concerns? Any correspondence is acceptable. Kudos to you for what you do! I appreciate you, - James Doe https://www.linkedin.com/in/jamesdoejr/ On Tue, Jul 4, 2023 at 3:37 PM Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com> wrote: > Just wanted to share some potentially good news with the group. > > There is the possibility of getting a Solid WG under way around September > 2023, hopefully completing around 2025, but maybe after that > > Nothing is final, and there's still some ways to go, but the issue can be > tracked here. > > https://github.com/solid/solid-wg-charter/issues/41 > > If the WG goes ahead, we can figure out, as a community group, which bits > of work go in which group, as things progress >
Received on Wednesday, 5 July 2023 13:09:42 UTC