- From: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2023 15:31:07 +0100
- To: Matthias Evering <me@evering.eu>
- Cc: public-solid <public-solid@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAKaEYh+=yepACBCu=UZLUGaySf+DoZnq83Ewg+GrHDshPd_6cg@mail.gmail.com>
Ășt 17. 1. 2023 v 12:01 odesĂlatel Matthias Evering <me@evering.eu> napsal: > Am 17.01.2023, 11:34 Uhr, schrieb Melvin Carvalho > <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>: > > > The Gitter service is ending on 6th Feb > > > > > https://blog.gitter.im/2023/01/16/gitter-is-going-fully-native-matrix-in-feb-2023/ > > they say we need a logout/login but functionality will stay around if I > understand right. > > > 1. What about the history > > see https://github.com/solid-contrib/gitter-solid/issues/34 > > I wonder if the various history links will sill work, and for how long > > > 2. New chat area > >Gitter is encouraging a transition to the Matrix/Element service. > > does that mean we need a Matrix account or anything ? > > Perhaps we could start a single room, say, on Mattias' solidweb which is a > running grass roots solid server. > > I will participate in these efforts if the community wants. > > > We would need to circulate an agreed upon URL for this to work. > > we can make a dedicated pod for that purpose and freely choose any URL. > it would look like `https://chatpod.solidweb.org/public/container` > <https://chatpod.solidweb.org/public/container> Thank you! Perhaps just "chat" instead of "chatpod" -- chat.solidweb.org looks like quite an attractive URI A question arises as to what to do about chat that grows in history over time. Do we already have a solution to this in mashlib? > > > > It could be beneficial to consider using Solid for chat, though based on > > the current low volume of chat on gitter it may not be a major concern. > > > Thoughts ? > > let's try to prepare best for feb. 6th. I have sympathy for eating own > dogfood. > > Matthias > -- > Matthias Evering (@ewingson) > >
Received on Tuesday, 17 January 2023 14:31:31 UTC